Shopping: Real Estate |  Costumes  |  Guitars
This Issue Archived Articles Blog About Us Contact Us

AutoSpeed Water Injection System Part 2

How the system works - and cooling the pump

by Julian Edgar

Click on pics to view larger images

At a glance...

  • System operation
  • Spray location
  • Some test results
Email a friend     Print article
Click for larger image

Last week we introduced the hardware of our new DIY water injection system. To briefly recap, it uses an ultra high pressure pump, a mains power inverter, cartridge filter and brass/stainless steel high quality atomising nozzle.

The result is a continuous flow of very small droplets of water.

System Operation

We said last week that the water injection system is ‘roughly proportional’. By that we mean that the amount of water being added to the intake air at high loads is greater than at low loads.

But why only ‘roughly proportional’? Why not use electronic control to achieve a precise outcome? Well, there’s more to that than meets the eye.

At first, building an accurately proportional system seems easy. For example, why not just pulse an injector flowing the water? However, that has three problems.

- The injector needs to be able to handle water without corroding. The only common injectors that meet this criterion are those designed for methanol.

- An injector system needs to be equipped with a pressure regulator – again one that will cope with water (and we don’t know of any of those).

- An ECU will need to be used to control the system.

And it gets even more complex than that. If you’re using just a single injector, its pulsing rate will need to be very fast. (A slow pulse adds ‘sausages’ [ie discrete amounts] of water to the intake. The problem with this is that each time the intake valves of a particular cylinder open, the water may not be present.) So what’s wrong with using a very fast pulse rate? Well, a large injector (and methanol injectors are large) pulsed very fast with a low duty cycle will end up not flowing anything – the opening times will be too short.

OK, so what about changing the speed of the pump to vary water flow? Again that’s possible (with this 240V powered pump we’d use something like a light dimmer), however our testing showed that once pump speed drops, water pressure plummets. The result is that the nozzle dribbles rather than atomising.

So is there a simple and cheaper way of making the water addition proportional to intake air flow?

Click for larger image

There is. Firstly, to avoid the ‘cylinder missing out’ scenario, the water injection spray needs to be continuous. Secondly, the easiest way of making the water addition proportional is to offer the engine intake all it wants. That is, if the spray is across the mouth of the airbox intake, a greater intake airflow will take more droplets, a smaller intake airflow will take less, and when the intake airflow is stopped (eg when the throttle is closed) no new droplets will pass into the system.

But there is a negative to this approach: because the water that doesn’t flow into the intake evaporates in the outside air, it’s much more wasteful of water. In itself that’s probably no big deal, but it means that a larger tank will be needed.

Having an exposed and open access nozzle also make it easier to periodically check the nozzle (for both flow and atomisation) and to remove the nozzle filter for cleaning.

A system of this sort can still have sophisticated control of when it starts and stops, so using water only when desired.

Spray Location

As described above, this system injects water in front of the air filter, at the engine intake. As far as we know, no other water injection system attempts to do this. So why do we?

Click for larger image

Firstly, one of the problems of before-turbo water injection is potential erosion of the compressor blades by the impingement of drops of water. When the turbo is spinning fast, such impacts have the potential to strip tiny fragments of metal off the blades, over time pitting it. Whether this actually occurs or not is open to question – but it is a valid question. Therefore, if injecting the water pre-turbo, it makes sense to keep the water droplet size to an absolute minimum.

Another potential problem of water injection is washing the oil off the cylinder bores, so increasing wear. There have been documented cases of this occurring in test engines, although the amount of water and how it was being atomised (was it being atomised?) are unknown. Therefore, it again makes sense to keep the water droplet size to an absolute minimum.

Finally, if the system is used in a diesel it’s very important that a large quantity of water cannot find its way into the engine. This is because the clearance volume (the volume above the piston at Top Dead Centre) is very low – that’s why the compression ratio of diesels is high. If enough water gets into the engine to fill the volume above the piston, engine damage will result from this hydraulic locking – in fact, the connecting rods will probably bend. (This occurs because water is not compressible.) It’s therefore vital that there is no way that sufficient water can ever enter the engine – even if something goes wrong with the water injection system. Injecting a fine spray of droplets the water into the intake air stream ahead of the filter makes it very unlikely that this problem will ever occur.

Droplet Size

At this point we need to take a look at water. Water in your bath is in liquid form; even when water is in very small drops, it is still in liquid form. As described is the breakout box below, it is the change of state from liquid to a gas that has such a huge energy uptake, therefore cooling the surrounding air. So no matter how small the droplets of water, they can still change in state – that is, evaporate and become water vapour.

Click for larger image

The water droplets in a cloud in the sky are in the order of 0.01mm (10 microns) in diameter. That’s pretty small – but they’re still droplets of water, not water vapour.

So what if we can generate water droplets of this size or even smaller? In that case, plenty will go straight through the air filter! Most fuel filters are rated at about 10 microns, and while it’s harder to say with certainty with air filters (most are tested using a broad spectrum dust and their filtration ability is based on how much of the dust they catch, not how small it is), you can be pretty confident that if you can make the drops of water sufficiently tiny, they’ll go all the way to the engine as a fog.

But does the Spraying System nozzle that we're using produce drops as small as 10 microns? We don’t know – we have no way of measuring drop size. However, even when running water injection continuously at the intake (in the test case some 100cm from the filter box), in normal driving the filter itself remains quite dry.

The other way of looking at it is to say that even if many drops are larger than 10 microns, the filter will filter them out, with the deposited water then evaporating over a little time. Clearly, though, testing should always include assessing the wetness of the filter element, and if it is becoming damp to touch, the system should be changed (eg in nozzle size or location).

From Water to Water Vapour

Evaporating a kilogram (ie a litre) of water requires 2257 kilo-joules of energy – and that’s a lot! If the nozzle flows 400 ml/minute, and if all the water evaporates, each minute 903 kilo-joules of energy are extracted. One joule per second is the equivalent of 1 watt, so fully evaporating 400 ml/min of water provides a cooling power of 15 kilowatts! Even a 130 ml/min spray provides a potential cooling power of just under 5kW.

The key point is that to cool the intake air, the water must evaporate – it is this change of state from water to a gas which absorbs the energy. And the key to getting water to evaporate is to use very small drops – an atomised mist – which dramatically increases the surface-area-to-volume-ratio of each drop, promoting evaporation.

In addition to drop size, the rate of evaporation will also depend on the relative humidity of the air (if you like, an indicator of how much ‘room’ there is left in the air for evaporated water) and the temperature of the intake plumbing.

Post Turbo Spray?

Because of the pressure the Ulka pump generates, if it’s desired, the spray nozzle can be placed on the intake after the turbo (and intercooler, if fitted). In other words, there will still be plenty of pressure left to create a good spray pattern even when working into boost pressure.

The advantage of this placement is that if there’s an intercooler prior to the spray, the ‘cooler will work better (because the temp differential between the cooler and the outside air will be greater than if the water spray is in front of the intercooler).

The disadvantages are that the system will no longer be proportional in water addition (the amount of water added at low loads will be much greater per cfm than at high loads); water may not all evaporate before reaching the combustion chamber; and it is more dangerous from a point of view of washing away cylinder wall lubricants and potentially water-locking diesel engines.


As we’ve covered previously, water injection can be used to perform a myriad of functions – from reducing the amount of fuel enrichment needed at high loads, to decreasing NOx emissions, to acting as a form of intercooler. We’ve not tested the system in every possible way, but we have fitted the system to two cars, with varying results.

Honda Insight

Click for larger image

The water injection system was used on the hybrid Honda Insight in an attempt to improve fuel consumption.

Already one of the world’s most economical cars, we thought it would be interesting to see if we could improve its cruise fuel economy. The car runs a very lean cruise (an air/fuel ratio of about 25:1!) and we wondered if with water injection, we could also use an interceptor to advance the ignition timing and so get even higher efficiency. (In this case the water would effectively increase the octane rating of the fuel, allowing ignition timing advance without detonation.)

As a first step we left the engine management standard and extensively tested the fuel consumption with and without the water injection system.  The water injection system flowed about 65 ml/minute. Over numerous tests we found a just-perceptible (but repeatable) fuel economy improvement – say about 3-5 per cent. With the water being added prior to the air filter intake, the whole intake system remained cold to touch, even after sitting on the freeway at 110 km/h for half an hour or more. The air filter also stayed dry.

As stated, this was with the engine management system standard; with the timing advanced, we fully expected to get even better results.

However, a water injection system that is going to improve cruise fuel consumption needs to be running whenever you’re cruising! And that translates to a large consumption of water. The range of the Honda is around 1000 kilometres, so if that was all done on the highway, you'd need something like 10 hours of water supply (or else you need to fill the water tank more frequently than the fuel tank). And ten hours of water is getting on for 40 litres – a lot in a little car.

For this reason, we decided not to pursue this approach any further. However, we think the testing we did showed the water injection system has major potential to reduce fuel consumption - and that must be even more the case with accompanying engine management mods.

Peugeot 405 diesel

Click for larger image

The other car that was tested with the high pressure water injection system was a Peugeot 405 diesel turbo. The car runs a mechanical fuel injection system that has been tweaked for extra turbo boost and extra performance.

Two aspects were tested with the water injection system, with again water added in front of the air filter.

The first approach was to see if reduced smoke emissions could be achieved. Smoke is a bugbear of the mechanical injection system because the system doesn’t have any compensation for higher intake air temps, resulting in full-throttle black smoke in hot conditions and no smoke in cold conditions. With 65 ml/minute water injection running on full load acceleration, smoke emissions visually appeared to be reduced.

The second approach was to use water injection as an intercooling agent. Testing of its effectiveness was carried out up a long, steep hill. This hill required that the car continuously stay on moderate boost for about 2 minutes.

The intake air temp after the intercooler was monitored, and the temperature rise between the bottom of the hill and the top of the hill assessed.

In standard form, the temperature rise was 39 degrees C (the intake air at the bottom was 28 degrees and at the top of the hill, 68 degrees C). With water injected ahead of the filter, the rise in intake air temp was barely any different at 37 degrees C.

Being a diesel, we were reluctant to inject the water directly into the engine (rather than through the filter) so no more water injection testing was carried out.

Note that in this case, much better results were obtained by using the spray on the intercooler core – with a larger TN 1.5 nozzle, the temp increase up the test hill was reduced to only 21 degrees C.


The above test results show that water injection is not a panacea for all automotive ills. You need, especially in continuous flow applications, to weigh up water consumption versus benefit, and to keep in mind that as an intercooler, cooling an existing core might be a better way to go.

However, the described hardware provides a robust and effective way of producing very small droplets of water. The water can be injected either before or after the filter, and the pump provides easily enough pressure to work against boost. The different nozzles allow a wide range of flows to be used and the ability to inject at the mouth of the engine intake gives proportionality of injection.

Did you enjoy this article?

Please consider supporting AutoSpeed with a small contribution. More Info...

Share this Article: 

More of our most popular articles.
Ideas that you can actually use in your home workshop

DIY Tech Features - 29 November, 2011

Real World Workshop Safety

Riding a DIY electric bike

DIY Tech Features - 18 February, 2005

Building an Electric Bike Part 3

From the weird to the weirder!

Special Features - 27 June, 2000

The GM Concept Cars

A day of testing with the Hyundai i30 diesel rally car

Special Features - 18 May, 2010

Pushing Limits

What's happened to electronic advances in cars?

Special Features - 19 May, 2009

Car Electronics Going Nowhere?

Starting with measuring the performance of the intake

DIY Tech Features - 25 January, 2011

Powering-Up the 1.9 litre TDI, Part 1

Developing a cutting-edge human-powered vehicle

DIY Tech Features - 12 May, 2009

Chalky, Part 1

A new low cost data logger

DIY Tech Features - 30 June, 2009

Five Channel USB Data Logger, Part 1

Tuning the system

DIY Tech Features - 8 January, 2013

Sound in the Lounge, Part 4

DIY knock detection - cheap, easy and very effective!

DIY Tech Features - 18 November, 2014

Hearing Detonation

Copyright © 1996-2020 Web Publications Pty Limited. All Rights ReservedRSS|Privacy policy|Advertise
Consulting Services: Magento Experts|Technologies : Magento Extensions|ReadytoShip